3-Step Identification of "Fake Flushable Wipes" YS-381 Test Standard Authority Guide
I. Industry Chaos: 90% of "Flushable Wipes" Are Misleading?
Recent explosive growth in wet toilet paper markets has exposed widespread "pseudo-flushable" traps:
❌ Fake Degradability: Labeled "flushable" but contains clogging synthetic fibers;
❌ Fake Testing: Substituting standard tests with (simple stirring), causing severe data distortion;
❌ Fake Certification: Counterfeiting international flushability logos (e.g., INDA/EDANA).
Real Case: A brand was fined ¥3.2 million for clogging municipal pipes; tests revealed wet strength retention rate >65% (far exceeding ≤25% standard)!
II. YS-381 Standard: The "Litmus Test" for Authentic Flushable Wipes
Core Principle: Simulates toilet vortex to quantify physical fragmentation and chemical dissolution rates.
▶ Genuine flushable wipes must simultaneously meet (GB/T 40275-2021):
Fragmentation Rate: ≥90% (YS-381 test value);
Residual Area: ≤5%;
Pipe Suspension Time: ≤2 hours.
III. Step-by-Step Guide: 3 Steps to Unmask Evidence with YS-381
Step 1: Sample Prep — Eliminate "Cheat Samples"
Sampling Protocol:
Cut 100mm×100mm wipes (must include full pattern layer);
Soak in 25±1°C distilled water for 30s, shake off surface liquid;
▶ Yanshuo Tip: Inferior products often thicken patterns to resist tearing — focus testing here.
Step 2: Equipment Setup — Precision Simulation
Parameter | Standard Value | Operation Key |
Stirring Speed | 800±10 rpm | Digital one-click calibration (vs. ±50rpm error in traditional equipment) |
Stirring Blades | 3-spiral propeller | 304 stainless steel anti-corrosion design |
Test Duration | 30 minutes | Auto countdown + buzzer alert |
Water Volume | 10L tap water | Equipped with quantitative sensor (±0.1L error) |
Step 3: Result Judgment — Exposing 4 "Fake Flushable" Types
Filter post-test solution through 2mm standard sieve:
Residue State | Authenticity | Hidden Trap |
Large intact fiber clusters | ❌ Fake | Added synthetics (e.g., polyester) |
>5% area film fragments | ❌ Fake | Non-hydroentangled nonwoven fabric |
Gel-like viscous sieve adhesion | ❌ Fake | Excessive adhesive (acrylate-based) |
Powder dispersion, no hard residue | ✅ Genuine | Compliant wood pulp + eco-adhesive |
IV. Pitfall Avoidance: 3 Common Self-Test Mistakes
1. Mistake: Replacing professional equipment with "manual stirring bucket + timer"
Risk: Low RPM inflates fragmentation rate by >15%!
Solution: YS-381 features servo motor closed-loop control (see data comparison).
2. Mistake: Ignoring "wet strength agent" interference
Truth: Some manufacturers add polyamide epichlorohydrin to temporarily reduce wet strength (rebounds after 3h)!
Countermeasure: Conduct multi-cycle tests (Yanshuo equipment supports auto-extension).
3. Mistake: Neglecting pH correlation
Warning: Alkaline environments (pH>8.5) accelerate fiber degradation, masking true performance!
Protocol: Calibrate solution to neutral pH before testing (free calibration by Yanshuo).
V. Decoding Authoritative Reports — 3 Critical Certifications
Verify third-party reports include:
1. Equipment Calibration ID (e.g., YS-381-CAL202407001);
2. Sieve Mesh Certification (GB/T 6003.1-2012 compliant);
3. Residue Micrographs (100x magnification for synthetic fibers).
Yanshuo Technical Service: YS-381 purchasers receive Flushability Verification Toolkit (standard sieve + pH strips + video guide).
Recently Posted
-
Why do disposable diapers need to be tested with professional testing instruments?
August 23, 2025I. Limitations of subjective assessment1.1 Uncontrollable factors in manual testingTraditional manual testing methods have many limitations:Inconsistent testing conditions: The temperature, volume, and pouring speed of the liquid are difficult to standardize in each test.Subjective result judgment: Different personnel have different judgment criteria.Difficult to quantify data: It is impossible to provide precise numerical evRead More -
Domestic vs. Imported Electronic Tensile Testing Machines: Performance Comparison and Cost-Effective
August 22, 20251. Brand Comparison: Technological Heritage and Market LandscapeImported Brands: Examples include Instron, MTS, and Zwick/Roell, which have long dominated the high-end market with a rich history and deep technological heritage. Their products are known for high precision and stability, particularly excelling in fields such as aerospace and cutting-edge scientific research. However, prices are generally high, often two times oRead More -
From Beginner to Expert: Daily Calibration and Error Compensation Techniques for Electronic Universa
August 21, 2025I. Why is Calibration So Important? The Chain Reaction of Errors:A 0.5% force value error can lead to a >20% deviation in fatigue life prediction (ASTM E739 data).Case Study: A spring factory failed to calibrate promptly, resulting in a batch of products exceeding stiffness standards and incurring losses of ¥800,000.Mandatory Standards:ISO 7500-1 stipulates: Class 1 equipment requiresRead More -
Electronic Tensile Tester Selection Guide: 5 Easily Overlooked Key Parameters
August 20, 2025I. Range Selection: Bigger Isn't Always BetterGolden Ratio Principle:Routine test forces should fall within 10%-90% of the range (ASTM E4 requirement)Case: A testing lab purchased a 100kN machine for 5N wire tests, resulting in ±8% error (3x over-limit)Multi-Range Solutions:Test TypeRecommended RangeAccuracy RangeTextile fibers0.5-500N±0.5%Automotive wires1-10kN±0.8%Metal materials10-300kN±1.0%Smart Sensor Tech:Zwick RoelRead More