YG033E Digital Fabric Tearing Tester
【Scope of Application】:
Uses the impact pendulum method to measure the tear strength of fabrics. It can also be used to measure the tear strength of paper, plastic sheeting, films, electrical tape, metal foils, and other materials.
【Compliance Standards】:
1. Textiles: GB/T 3917.1; ASTM D1424; DIN 53862; EN ISO 13937-1;
ISO 4674-2; ISO 9290; M&S P29; NEXT17; NF G07-149;
2. Paper: GB/T 455; APPITA P 400; ASTM D 689; BS 4468; CSA D9; DIN 53128;
EN 21974; ISO 1974; JIS P 8116; PAPTAC D9; SCAN P11; TAPPI T414;
UNI 6444;
3. Plastics: GB/T 11999; ASTM D1922; ISO 6383-2; JIS K 7128-2; NF T54 141;
4. Nonwovens: ASTM D5734; WSP 100.1.
【Instrument Features】:
1. Large color LCD touchscreen operation, Chinese/English interface, simple operation.
2. Built-in panel printer for direct test report printing.
3. Automatic testing, calculation, and result analysis; test data can be freely accessed.
4. Built-in test units: N, gf, cN, cP; can be directly selected and automatically converted.
5. Pneumatic sample clamping and pendulum release ensure consistent clamping force.
6. Automatic sample cutting ensures consistent cut shape.
【Technical Parameters】:
1. Pendulum Weights: A: 0~16N; B: 0~32N; C: 0~64N; D: 0~128N;
2. Test Accuracy: ≤±0.1% F.S.;
3. Tear Length: 43mm;
4. Cut Length: 20±0.1mm;
5. Sample Size: 100×63mm;
6. Sample Clamping: Pneumatic;
7. Power Supply: AC220V;
8. Power: 150W;
9. Dimensions: 560×420×530mm;
10. Net Weight: 60Kg.
Recently Posted
-
Why do disposable diapers need to be tested with professional testing instruments?
August 23, 2025I. Limitations of subjective assessment1.1 Uncontrollable factors in manual testingTraditional manual testing methods have many limitations:Inconsistent testing conditions: The temperature, volume, and pouring speed of the liquid are difficult to standardize in each test.Subjective result judgment: Different personnel have different judgment criteria.Difficult to quantify data: It is impossible to provide precise numerical evRead More -
Domestic vs. Imported Electronic Tensile Testing Machines: Performance Comparison and Cost-Effective
August 22, 20251. Brand Comparison: Technological Heritage and Market LandscapeImported Brands: Examples include Instron, MTS, and Zwick/Roell, which have long dominated the high-end market with a rich history and deep technological heritage. Their products are known for high precision and stability, particularly excelling in fields such as aerospace and cutting-edge scientific research. However, prices are generally high, often two times oRead More -
From Beginner to Expert: Daily Calibration and Error Compensation Techniques for Electronic Universa
August 21, 2025I. Why is Calibration So Important? The Chain Reaction of Errors:A 0.5% force value error can lead to a >20% deviation in fatigue life prediction (ASTM E739 data).Case Study: A spring factory failed to calibrate promptly, resulting in a batch of products exceeding stiffness standards and incurring losses of ¥800,000.Mandatory Standards:ISO 7500-1 stipulates: Class 1 equipment requiresRead More -
Electronic Tensile Tester Selection Guide: 5 Easily Overlooked Key Parameters
August 20, 2025I. Range Selection: Bigger Isn't Always BetterGolden Ratio Principle:Routine test forces should fall within 10%-90% of the range (ASTM E4 requirement)Case: A testing lab purchased a 100kN machine for 5N wire tests, resulting in ±8% error (3x over-limit)Multi-Range Solutions:Test TypeRecommended RangeAccuracy RangeTextile fibers0.5-500N±0.5%Automotive wires1-10kN±0.8%Metal materials10-300kN±1.0%Smart Sensor Tech:Zwick RoelRead More