Contact Supplier

Liu

Liu

Your inquiry content must be between 10 to 5000 characters

Please enter Your valid email address

Please enter a correct verification code.

Xi'an Yanshuo Instrument Equipment Co., Ltd AIBot OnlineThis conversation is AI-generated. Contact manufacturer before transaction to confirm info.
  • Liu
    Hi there! Welcome to my shop. Let me know if you have any questions.

Please enter a correct verification code.

Liu
Hi there! Welcome to my shop. Let me know if you have any questions.

"Breathability ≠ Permeability! Authoritative Evaluation Methodology for Fluid Permeability of Nonwov

2025-07-16 09:11:49

The opening: Lessons in blood and tears reveal the cognitive gap.

When a medical melt-blown fabric manufacturer faced a mass recall of surgical gowns due to excessive reliance on breathability data, revealing a harsh reality: gas permeability (breathability) and liquid barrier resistance (permeation) operate on entirely different principles. The mask stuffiness, diaper back-leakage, and filter oil leakage——90% failures all stem from misjudging "permeability". This article will demystify industry perceptions and use four testing keys to pinpoint the true penetration capabilities of nonwoven fabrics.

1First battlefield: Conceptual clearing —— breathability = the essential divergence of penetration

Gas permeability and liquid permeability are like birds and fish they must never be confused. Air permeability measures the ability of air to pass through (e.g., masks require 100 L/m²/s airflow), with the Fraser permeability meter as the core equipment. Permeability, on the other hand, evaluates liquid barrier efficiency (e.g., surgical gowns requiring blood penetration>60 minutes), relying on automated liquid permeability meters for precise detection. The most critical difference lies in their application media: the former targets free gas molecule diffusion, while the latter involves a life-and-death struggle between liquid surface tension and fiber infiltration. Take automotive filters as an example: measuring only permeability completely ignores the risk of high-viscosity engine oil penetration. ——When 0.3mm pores encounter 40hot oil, the penetration rate can surge by 17 times!

2The second battlefield: four test methods to overcome the actual difficulties

Liquid Penetration Sniper Test (ISO 9073-13) serves as the life-and-death test for medical protective equipment: A 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate solution (simulating body fluid surface tension) is dripped onto samples, with complete penetration time recorded. Medical-grade fabrics must exceed 60 minutes, while sanitary napkin surfaces require <3 seconds to prevent moisture. Air Penetration Blitz Test (GB/T 5453) reveals breathing resistance truths: Under a 100±10Pa pressure differential (simulating human breathing pressure), N95 melt-blown fabric must maintain 350Pa. A 5% pressure differential deviation triggers 35% data fluctuation! Virus-level Interception Test (ASTM F2298) employs laser particle counters scanning 0.1-10μm particles, requiring N95 masks to retain 95% of 0.3μm aerosols. Extreme Environment Dual-Test pushes materials to extremes: Oil permeability measured in-40°℃ cold chambers combined with 20Hz vibration tables simulating automotive filter conditions. Only data surviving rigorous torture can be trusted.

3Third battlefield: a guide to the three invisible killers

The static voltage phenomenon acts like a stealthy threat in permeability testing, causing particle detection failure rates for 0.3μm particles to skyrocket by 58%——. Neutralizing ions with a 15-second ion wind rod proves crucial for breakthroughs. Temperature and humidity fluctuations are the primary nemesis of liquid permeability only maintaining constant temperature and humidity at 23℃±1°C and 50% RH±5% can curb 35% data drift. For multi-layer composite structures like SMS non-woven fabrics, the dual-track approach of layered independent testing combined with holistic validation remains the only viable solution. A filter material manufacturer once faced millions of returned masks due to insufficient filtration efficiency caused by neglecting electrostatic interference this starkly illustrates the critical gap between laboratory and real-world testing environments.

4The fourth battlefield: life and death decision of equipment selection

Liquid permeability testers must be equipped with a six-channel automatic dropper arm (precision ±0.005ml) and millisecond-level infrared sensors. Manual dropper devices can cause 50% result distortion due to a mere 0.1ml liquid difference. Gas permeability testers need to cover the pressure differential range of 0-5000Pa and have built-in temperature/humidity compensation chips. Single-point sampling models will completely mask material uniformity defects. The more dangerous pitfall lies in test solution preparation: —— Using water instead of standard solutions to simulate bodily fluids is like using a wooden shield to block bullets a protective suit manufacturer once paid millions in recall costs for this mistake.


Tags: Determining the permeability of non-woven fabrics